Sunday Night Ramblings, Part I

I just finished re-watching Soylent Green (1973) a rather nice piece of 70’s dystopian sci-fi. The story doesn’t quite follow the Harry Harrison novel (Maker Room! Make Room! (1966)) but it has that distinct 70’s quality about it, from a time when we were last scared about over-crowding, destruction of the biosphere, climate change etc. It has a scene were two of the main characters eat a supper made out of Real beef and some warn-out vegetables, stolen from a scene of crime. And its the best meal they’ve had in a long time, or ever.

Funnily enough, the most modern thing in the film, an early arcade game Space War (1971) is the most dated thing in the film. I think one can draw a certain rule from here: If a technology is new, don’t portray it in any work claiming to be set in the future, you’ll just get its whole impact wrong and it ends up looking cheesy and dated.

The film was Edward G. Robinsons last, he died 9 days after his last scene. His last scene was a nice piece of 70’s cynical view of the future. Robinsons character goes to “home”, a place to have a nice, dignified death. You lie on a bed, you have 20 minutes to listen your favourite music and watch lovely landscapes. The main character, played by Charlton Heston, have to talk to him before he dies. According to IMDB, Heston was the only one knowing that Robinson was dieing of cancer, so his tears in the scene were real.

Another piece of nice 70’s cynicism of the future, were young women called furniture. Yes, they were part of an apartments facilities and Hestons character casually has sex with one of them, in the same way he steals soap, booze and food from the apartment.

Ohh, 70’s, I miss you so…

2 thoughts on “Sunday Night Ramblings, Part I

  1. In truth, immediately i didn’t understand the essence. But after re-reading all at once became clear.

  2. Oh, oh, immediately you didn’t understand the essence did you? But did you re-read all at once? Did that make it clear? Or are there still tiny pockets of misunderstandment in your mind, even though you did re-read it all at once?

    If you did understand the essence, can you give me a short digest of it? You know, just in case somebody else out there didn’t understand the essence either (immediately)? It would almost definetely save somebody else from having to re-read all at once.

    How was War and Peace?

Comments are closed.